Back to Top

Tag Archives: ID

The Real Story Behind The Bundy Ranch Harassment | The Dana Show

By now you’re familiar with the standoff between the federal government, i.e. the Bureau of Land Management, and 67 year-old rancher Cliven Bundy. (If not, check the backstory and my radio interview with him here.) The BLM asserts their power through the expressed desire to protect the endangered desert tortoise, a tortoise so “endangered” that their population can no longer be contained by the refuge constructed for them so the government is closing it and euthanizing over a thousand tortoises. The tortoises, the excuse that BLM has given for violating claims to easements and running all but one lone rancher out of southern Nevada, is doing fine. In fact, the tortoise has lived in harmony with cattle in the Gold Butte, Clark County Nevada for over a hundred years, or as long as Cliven Bundy’s family has lived on the land as ranchers. In fact, the real threat to it is urbanization, not cattle.

A tortoise isn’t the reason why BLM is harassing a 67 year-old rancher. They want his land. The tortoise wasn’t of concern when Harry Reid worked BLM to literally change the boundaries of the tortoise’s habitat to accommodate the development of his top donor, Harvey Whittemore. Whittemore was convicted of illegal campaign contributions to Senator Reid. Reid’s former senior adviser is now the head of BLM. Reid is accused of using the new BLM chief as a puppet to control Nevada land (already over 84% of which is owned by the federal government) and pay back special interests. BLM has proven that they’ve a situational concern for the desert tortoise as they’ve had no problem waiving their rules concerning wind or solar power development. Clearly these developments have vastly affected a tortoise habitat more than a century-old, quasi-homesteading grazing area. If only Clive Bundy were a big Reid donor.

BLM has also tried to argue that the rules have changed, long after Bundy claims he secured rights and paid his dues to Clark County, Nevada. BLM says they supersede whatever agreement Bundy had prior; they demanded that he reduce his living, his thousand-some-odd head of cattle down to a tiny herd of 150. It’s easy for the government to grant itself powers of overreach, but it doesn’t make it right. Many bad things are done in the name of unjust laws. Just look at Obamacare. This heavy-handed tactic has run the other ranchers from the area and now Bundy is the last one. He’s the last one because he stood up to the federal government.

So why does BLM want to run Bundy off this land and is Reid connected?

I discussed this on “Kelly File” tonight, video via Jim Hoft.

*UPDATE: Those who say Bundy is a “deadbeat” are making inaccurate claims. Bundy has in fact paid fees to Clark County, Nevada in an arrangement pre-dating the BLM. The BLM arrived much later, changed the details of the setup without consulting with Bundy — or any other rancher — and then began systematically driving out cattle and ranchers. Bundy refused to pay BLM, especially after they demanded he reduce his heard’s head count down to a level that would not sustain his ranch. Bundy OWNS the water and forage rights to this land. He paid for these rights. He built fences, established water ways, and constructed roads with his own money, with the approval of Nevada and BLM. When BLM started using his fees to run him off the land and harassing him, he ceased paying. So should BLM reimburse him for managing the land and for the confiscation of his water and forage rights?

Cliven Bundy’s problem isn’t that he didn’t pay — he did — or that his cattle bother tortoises — they don’t — it’s that he’s not a Reid donor.

**One last thought: For those conservatives saying that since BLM arrived in the late 90s, it’s the law now, well, so is Obamacare.

via The Real Story Behind The Bundy Ranch Harassment | The Dana Show.

Posted in Blog page| Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

Tweets about “#BundyRanch”

 

Militia groups are rallying behind a rancher whose cattle are being seized by the federal government.

 

The Las Vegas Review-Journal reports that two militia members from Montana and one from Utah have arrived at Cliven Bundy’s ranch.

 

“We need to be the barrier between the oppressed and the tyrants,” Ryan Payne of the West Mountain Rangers told the Review-Journal. “Expect to see a band of soldiers.”

 

Payne said that militias from New Hampshire, Texas and Florida are likely to join and stand with Bundy and stay at his ranch.

 

“They all tell me they are in the process of mobilizing as we speak,” Payne told the Review-Journal, adding that hundreds of militia members are expected.

 


 

Posted in Blog page| Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

The Break-Up of the American Family Can Be Traced Directly Back to Liberalism – The Rush Limbaugh Show

o

via The Break-Up of the American Family Can Be Traced Directly Back to Liberalism – The Rush Limbaugh Show.

The Break-Up of the American Family Can Be Traced Directly Back to Liberalism

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Eric, Newtown, Connecticut. It’s great to have you on the program.  Hello.

CALLER:  Hi, Rush.  I really do appreciate you taking calls, giving the few the opportunity to speak to the millions.

RUSH:  Well, I’m glad you waited.  I appreciate your patience.

CALLER:  I gotta also give you a huge pat on the back, too.  I’m not sure… You know, fame, it doesn’t come in one flavor that everybody wants a piece.  What you’re doing is really a courageous thing for truth, simply being truthful. It’s quite a burden that you have to carry to do that.  I really appreciate it.  But the point I wanted to make, Rush, was that the problem that’s going on in this country right now is broken hearts.

These people, these dysfunctional females are making these young people. Everyone starts off with youth, and if they don’t have a father who’s showing them how to do life, they want to cling to anything. They really do trust Obama, period! They trust him, and, let me tell you, they’d reelect him.  I know.  I live and work with these people.  They really would reelect Obama right now.

They don’t care about the Constitution.

They don’t care about how many people died for them to have the right to do anything that’s going on around them.  It’s an every-man-for-himself existence that they live right now, and it really is a sad thing.  If people looked at it from this point of view, the people who have had Pops… God bless him. Like you’ve shared so much of your life, your personal life with us, Rush.

Not everybody had Pops in their life.  I did have a strong moral father in my life, but that’s where we learned how we don’t have to be afraid, and then where did we learn our morals from? We learned it in the church! There’s a whole other thing that young people and people in general want to stay away from because that’s the place where people gonna get judged.

RUSH:  I know.

CALLER:  There’s no judging these people. That’s like a personally attack!

RUSH:  I know. People have not been taught to take risks. They have not been taught to learn how to get along on their own.

CALLER:  They’re scared to death, Rush, and they trust Obama.  You know, it’s not happening by accident, this whole Obamacare thing.  It’s not called the Affordable Health Care Act for nothing.

RUSH:  I know.  It’s called the Obama phone.  It’s called Obama stamps.

CALLER:  It’s because they trust him.

RUSH:  Well, look, that argument that he made is irrefutable when applied certain people.  He’s basically saying that the breakup of the traditional family causes it. He’s focused on lack of father ’cause they’re the ones that vamanos mostly and the government comes right in and assumes the role of father — and it doesn’t just affect young boys, Eric.  Single women likewise end up looking at government as provider, protector, you name it.

None of the rest matters.  You exactly right.  “Constitution? The hell with that!  Free speech? I don’t care!  Where is my phone?  I don’t care! Where are my food stamps or whatever.  I mean, you gotta eat, and you’ve got to live, and I don’t care about the Fourth Amendment and searches and seizures. I don’t care!  Where am I gonna get my whatever?”  So I know.  That’s also by design, by the way.

The breakup of the family, you can trace it.  You can trace this.  You can trace it right back to 1964 and the Great Society and Lyndon Johnson.  You can trace it.  You can trace the bust-up of the family — you can trace the dissolution of black families, you can trace the rampant increase in poverty, you can trace the amount of money that has been transferred to deal with these inequalities and inequities — and you will see that all of this “charity” quote/unquote has just given rise to the need for more of it.

It hasn’t solved anything.

Eric, I appreciate the call.

END TRANSCRIPT

Posted in Education| Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

A ‘New York Compliant’ AR-15 | TheBlaze.com plus BBC on top

the Best Blaze Comment (BBC)

TEXAS-FREEDOM Apr. 3, 2014 at 1:58pm

It’s great that they tried this, but instead of making a gun compliant with New York, why not make
New York compliant with the Constitution?

Here’s What It Looks Like When a Gun Manufacturer Releases a ‘New York Compliant’ AR-15 | TheBlaze.com.

A Missouri-based gun manufacturer announced this week that it will release a line of “New York Compliant” rifles, a market-based response to the Empire State’s strict new gun laws.

“With the continual trampling of the 2nd Amendment in New York, Black Rain Ordnance is proud to announce their ‘New York Compliant’ rifles,” the group said in a statement on its website. “These rifles feature all of the quality and craftsmanship of the standard BRO-lines, but with the added features that allow for legal possession.”

Features that make Black Rain Ordnance’s new rifles compliant with New York’s guns laws include: No pistol grip, a non-threaded muzzle fixed stock, 10-round low capacity approved magazine and a Lo-Pro gas block “without the evil bayonet lug.”

Image source: Black Rain Ordnance

Image source: Black Rain Ordnance

Image source: Black Rain Facebook

Image source: Black Rain Ordinance’s Facebook page.

And if Black Rain’s move to create rifles that comply with New York’s new guns laws, which have been described as some of the “nation’s toughest,” sounds familiar, it should: They’re not the only company to move in this direction, and stories of such guns have been popping up since May 2013.

In fact, several New York-based gun shops have, for example, offered to replace the grip on non-complaint rifles so that they’re square with state’s laws.

“The modified gun still fires at the same rate and with the same power; the shooter just holds it slightly differently,” the Guardian reported. “These modified weapons do not have to be registered with the state.”

One gun maker in Rochester, N.Y., Just Right Carbines, manufactures modified semi-automatic rifles that comply with the New York’s Safe Act, which was signed into law by Gov. Andrew Cuomo in January 2013.

Just Right Carbines’ general manger, Anthony Testa, told the Guardian that New York authorities signed off on the modified rifles, telling him that his products complied with the law.

The Safe Act, which was the result of the 2012 mass shooting in Newtown, Conn., that claimed the life of 27 people, bans the sale of so-called “assault weapons” and requires that everyone who already owns a rifle categorized as such to register them with the state by 15 April 2014.

The Safe Act singles out add-on features, including bayonet mounts, grenade launchers and, of course, “protruding pistol grips.”

Another New York company, H&H Firearms, has been working on modifying its semi-automatic rifles to meet state law.

“It’s basically an AR-15 without the features,” a lawyer representing H&H Firearms told the Times Union.

“People are champing at the bit” for a legal version of the popular rifle, said the company’s manager Justin Reickart, adding that the modified rifles look “like a paintball gun.”

How the ObamaCare Tax Penalty (fee) Works

 

Your tax penalty (shared responsibility fee) for not having insurance is paid on your federal income taxes at the end of the year. If your taxable income is below 133% of the federal poverty level you are exempt from this tax.

2014 = $95 per person per year or 1% of your Income
2015 = $325 per person per year or 2% of your Income
2016 = $695 per person per year or 2.5% of your Income
2017 = Tax Penalty will increase by the rate of inflation going forward, or 2.5% of your Income

• If you’re uninsured for just part of the year, 1/12 of the yearly penalty applies to each month you’re uninsured.

• The penalty is based on modified adjusted gross income and is paid on your federal income taxes.

• The total penalty for the taxable year cannot exceed the national average of the annual premiums of a bronze-level health insurance plan offered through the health insurance marketplaces.

• The maximum penalty per family is capped at no more than 300% of the minimum penalty (e.g. $695 x 300% = $2,085).

• Children under 18 are assessed at 50% of the minimum penalty.

• The penalty is pro-rated for the number of months you are without health insurance, though there is no penalty for a single gap in coverage of less than 3 months in a year.

• Health insurance plans will provide proof of coverage for their customers so as long as you have health insurance you don’t have to worry about the details.

 

http://obamacarefacts.com/obamacare-individual-mandate.php

Posted in Government, Obamacare| Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

Keep Your Hippocratic Oath Free Justina Pelletier

Keep Your Hippocratic Oath Free Justina

You are Killing #JustinaPelletier

Hippocratic Oath

n.

An oath of ethical professional behavior sworn by new physicians and attributed to Hippocrates.

 

I swear by Apollo the Physician, Asclepius, Hygeia, Panaceia, and all the gods and goddesses, making them my witnesses, that I will fulfill this oath and this covenant according to my ability and judgment: 
To regard him who teaches me the art of medicine as equal to my parents; to share my life with him and, if he is in need, my sustenance; to regard his children as my brothers and to teach them this art, if they wish to learn it, without fee or covenant; to give instruction, written, oral, and practical, to my sons and the sons of my teacher, as well as to any students who have signed a covenant and sworn an oath according to the canons of our profession, but to no others. 
I will apply therapeutic measures for the benefit of the sick according to my ability and judgment, and will abstain from harm and wrongdoing. 
I will not give a lethal drug to anyone requesting it, nor will I recommend the use of such. Likewise I will not give a woman an abortive drug. 
I will live my life and practice my art in purity and in holiness. 
I will not perform surgery, even on sufferers from stone, but will not interfere with those who engage in such work. 
Whatever houses I enter, I will do so for the benefit of the sick, refraining from all intentional wrongdoing and misconduct, particularly from sexual involvement with persons of either gender, whether free or slaves. 
I will not divulge anything of a private nature regarding people’s personal lives that I see or hear, whether in the course of my professional activities or not, because I recognize the shamefulness of revealing such information. 
If I carry out this oath and do not break it, may I find satisfaction in life and the practice of my profession and may I deserve honor among men forever. If I violate it and swear falsely, may the opposite be my lot.

Executive leadership Boston Children’s Hospital
 
Sandra L. Fenwick, President and Chief Executive Officer Kevin Churchwell, MD, Executive Vice President of Health Affairs and Chief Operating Officer

Leadership

President and Chief Executive Officer: Sandra L. Fenwick

Executive Vice President of Health Affairs and Chief Operating Officer: Kevin Churchwell, MD

Physician-in-Chief, Pediatrician in Chief, Chair of Department of Medicine: Gary R. Fleisher, MD

Surgeon-in-Chief: James Kasser, MD

Executive Director, Heart Center: Michael J. Anderegg

Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer: Dick Argys

Executive Director, Satellite Clinical Operations: Julee Bolg, RN, MS, MBA

Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing and Communications Officer: Margaret Coughlin

Chief Innovation Officer: Naomi Fried, PhD

Vice President, Clinical Services: Michael Gillespie

Vice President, Research Administration: Gus Cervini

Vice President, Government Relations: Josh Greenberg

Senior Vice President, Chief Safety and Quality Officer: Kathy Jenkins, MD

Vice President, Strategy: Jean Mixer

Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer: Daniel Nigrin, MD, MS

Senior Vice President and General Counsel: Stuart Novick, Esq.

Chief Investment Officer: Phil Rotner

Senior Vice President, Patient Care Services and Chief Nursing Officer: Laura J. Wood, DNP, MS, RN

Vice President, Human Resources: Inez Stewart

President, Children’s Hospital Trust: Lynn Susman

Vice President of Support Services: Henry Tomasuolo

Chief Financial Officer (CFO): Doug Vanderslice

Executive Director, Satellite Administrative Operations: Jane Venti

Senior Vice President, Network Development and Strategic Partnerships: Wendy Warring, JD

Vice President, Real Estate Planning and Development: Charles Weinstein, Esq.

Department and division chiefs

Department of Anesthesiology 
Paul R. Hickey, MD, Anesthesiologist-in-Chief

Department of Cardiac Surgery: Pedro Del Nido

Department of Cardiology: James Lock, MD, Cardiologist-in-Chief

Department of Dentistry: Man Wai Ng

Department of Laboratory MedicineOrah Platt

Department of Medicine:
Gary Fleisher, Physician-in-Chief
Frederick Lovejoy, Associate Physician-in-Chief

Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine: S. Jean Emans

Division of Clinical Pediatric Oncology: Lisa R. Diller

Division of Developmental Medicine: Leonard Rappaport, MD, MS

Division of Emergency Medicine: Richard G. Bachur, MD

Division of Endocrinology: Joseph A. Majzoub, MD

Division of Gastroenterology/Nutrition: Wayne I. Lencer, MD

Clinical Research Center:
Stavroula Osganian, MD, ScD, MPH
Ellis Neufeld

Division of General Pediatrics: Mark A. Schuster, MD, PhD

Division of Genetics: Christopher A. Walsh, MD, PhD

Division of Hematology/Oncology: David A. Williams, MD

Division of Immunology: Raif Geha, MD

Division of Infectious Diseases: Michael Wessels, MD

Division of Molecular Medicine: Stephen Harrison, PhD

Division of Nephrology: William E. Harmon, MD

Division of Newborn Medicine: Stella Kourembanas, MD

Division of Respiratory Diseases: Craig Gerard, MD, PhD

Department of Neurology: Scott L. Pomeroy, MD, PhD

Division of Epilepsy: 
Blaise Bourgeois, MD

Department of NeurosurgeryAlan Cohen, MD, FACS, FAAP

Department of Ophthalmology: David G. Hunter, MD, PhD

Department of Orthopedic Surgery: James R. Kasser, MD, Surgeon-in-Chief

Division of Sports Medicine: Lyle J. Micheli, MD

Department of OtolaryngologyMichael J. Cunningham, MD

Department of Pathology: Mark Daniel Fleming, MD, DPhil

Department of Plastic Surgery: John G. Meara, MD, DMD, MBA

Section of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery: Bonnie L. Padwa, DMD, MD

Department of Psychiatry: David R. DeMaso, MD

Division of Psychology: Eugene J. D’Angelo, PhD

Department of Radiology: Richard L. Robertson, Jr., MD

Division of Computed Tomography: Michael J. Callahan, MD

Division of Diagnostic Radiology: Kirsten Ecklund, MD

Division of Interventional Radiology: Darren B. Orbach, MD, PhD

Division of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Caroline D. Robson, MB, ChB

Division of Neuroradiology: Caroline D. Robson, MB, ChB

Division of Nuclear Medicine/PET: 
Stephan D. Voss, MD, PhD
Laura Drubach

Division of Ultrasound: Carol E. Barnewolt, MD

Department of Surgery: Robert C. Shamberger, MD

Division of Gynecology: Marc R. Laufer, MD

Department of Urology: David A. Diamond, MD

GenomicsLouis Kunkel, PhD

Informatics: Isaac Kohane, MD, PhD

NeuroscienceClifford Woolf, PhD

Stem Cell/Developmental BiologyLeonard Zon, MD

Vascular Biology: Marsha A. Moses, PhD

Everyone listed above is responsible in whole or in part of this DCF

Posted in Blog page| Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

ANJRPC Permitting StrikeForce! – Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs

Help Them Out When You Can
ANJRPC Permitting StrikeForce! – Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs.

 

ANJRPC LAUNCHES STATEWIDE CRACKDOWN

ON PERMITTING ABUSES!

Contact ANJRPC’S Permitting StrikeForce Today

With Permitting Abuses You Have Suffered!

Strikeforce Logo

 

On February 25, 2014, ANJRPC announce the launch of its Permitting StrikeForce™ program—an ambitious statewide initiative to address firearms permitting abuses throughout the entire Garden State. The program is aimed at ending, once and for all, the extensive delays, unauthorized conditions, and other widespread abuses plaguing the issuance of firearms ID cards and handgun purchase permits.

“We are serving legal notices covering each and every one of New Jersey’s 565 municipalities, informing them of their obligations in no uncertain terms,” said ANJRPC Executive Director Scott Bach. “Once we complete this legal sweep of the entire state, we intend to systematically crack down on specific abuses town by town until they are addressed.” 

The notices will facilitate possible legal action against non-compliant towns, and include a detailed 10-page analysis of current law, together with copies of controlling legal documents, including an important new court decision forbidding additional conditions on permit applications beyond what state law already requires. Many towns impose outrageous, unauthorized conditions including employer notification, spousal consent, disclosure of all household member names, and passing a written exam.

Many municipalities also ignore state law requiring application decisions within 30 days; some applicants wait over 8 months or longer before getting a decision. Other municipalities improperly ration handgun purchase permits, which is explicitly prohibited.  Some towns also deny applications based solely on residency in public housing

“Permitting authorities need to understand that we have entered a new era after the groundbreaking U.S. Supreme Court decisions in the Heller and McDonald cases,” said Bach. “It is unlawful to interfere with Second Amendment rights by abusing the permitting process, and ANJRPC will spare no effort or expense to stop further abuse.”

ANJRPC first began addressing permitting issues on a case-by-case basis in 2009. Recent legal developments made it viable to launch ANJRPC’S Permitting StrikeForce™ as the first-ever comprehensive compliance sweep over the entire state. The program is synergistic and complementary with the efforts of other organizations on permitting issues.

ANJRPC’s Permitting StrikeForce™ needs YOU!  Please tell us about unauthorized conditions, delays, permit rationing, and public housing denials in your town. Your identity will be protected, but your input will help us get the job done! Please email strikeforce@anjrpc.org or leave a message at (973) 697-9270.  Please include as much detail as you can, including (if possible) the following:

  • Municipality, Town, or Barracks
  • Type of Permit applied for (FID or Handgun Purchase Permit)
  • Date application was submitted & current status
  • What was submitted (what forms, documents, etc.)
  • Copies of unusual forms or requirements (if available)
  • Detail all contact with permitting authority since submission (dates, content, contact name, what you were told, etc.)
  • Your name and contact information
  •  Any other pertinent details

 

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR EFFORTS!  JOIN or DONATE TO ANJRPC TODAY!

 

SUBSCRIBE TO ANJRPC’S FREE EMAIL ALERTS.

Posted in Blog page| Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

Give Grandma A Pill: The complete lives system

#Obamacare How It Will Kill You: The complete lives system discriminates against older people…

The proposal made by DALY advocates; however, the complete lives system justifies preference to younger people because of priority to the worst-off rather than instrumental value. Additionally, the complete lives system assumes that, although life-years are equally valuable to all, justice requires the fair distribution of them. Conversely,DALY allocation treats life-years given to elderly or disabled people as objectively less valuable. Finally, the complete lives system is least vulnerable to corruption. Age can be established quickly and accurately from identity documents. Prognosis allocation encourages physicians to improve patients’ health, unlike the perverse incentives to sicken patients or misrepresent health that the sickest-first allocation creates.

Objections
We consider several important objections to the complete lives system. The complete lives system discriminates against older people.
Age-based allocation is ageism.
Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination; every person lives through different life stages rather than being a single age.
Even if 25-year-olds receive priority over 65-year-olds, everyone who is 65 years now was previously 25 years.
Treating 65-year-olds differently because of stereotypes or falsehoods would be ageist; treating them differently because they have already had more life-years is not. Age, like income, is a “non-medical criterion” inappropriate for allocation of medical resource

 

[xyz-ihs snippet=”7″]

%d bloggers like this: